The Road Not Taken
by Robert Lee Frost
Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;
Then took the other, as just as fair
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that, the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,
And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I --
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
Thesis: Frost uses metaphors, 1st person point of view and imagery to explain how taking 'the path less travelled by' has made all the difference in his life.
1. Why does the poet describes the woods as "yellow" in the first line? Is it symbolic of the time of year of of the significance of the colour yellow or something else?
2. Do you think it is better to take the road that is less traveled, or the road that many have traveled?
3. Is it possible that the two roads are, were, or can be, somewhat similar?
4. What do you believe that the narrator means when he says "I shall be telling this with a sigh"? Is is out of relief, regret, or something else?
5. Have there been times when you have traveled down one road and have wished that you had taken the other?
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Amy's Poem and Handout
Poetry Seminar
Amy Hurst
The Children Are Laughing
It is Monday and the children are laughing
The children are laughing; they believe they are princes
They wear no shoes; they believe they are princes
And their filthy kingdom heaves up behind them.
The filthy city heaves up behind them
They are older than I am, their feet are shoeless
They have lived a thousand years; the children are laughing
The children are laughing and their death is upon them
I have cried in the city (the children are laughing)
I have worn many colors (the children are laughing)
They are older than I am, their death is upon them
I will wear no shoes when the princes are dying.
-Gwendolyn MacEwen
Thesis: MacEwan's use of imagery, first person point of view, and repetition serves as a clear demonstration into the reaction she thinks that children have to life's dire circumstances.
Questions:
1. Who do you think MacEwan is talking about when she says, 'the children'?
2. She says, "They are older than I am, their feet are shoeless. They have lived a thousand years; the children are laughing." Why do you think she still refers to them as children if they have 'lived a thousand years'?
3. Why do you think the poem mentions Monday, but no other day?
4. Do you think that children today act older than they actually are? In what ways?
5. How do you think "The children are laughing and their death is upon them" applies to our lives? Do you think it's an accurate representation of our youth?
6. What do you think she means in the final line when she says, "I will wear no shoes when the princes are dying"?
Amy Hurst
The Children Are Laughing
It is Monday and the children are laughing
The children are laughing; they believe they are princes
They wear no shoes; they believe they are princes
And their filthy kingdom heaves up behind them.
The filthy city heaves up behind them
They are older than I am, their feet are shoeless
They have lived a thousand years; the children are laughing
The children are laughing and their death is upon them
I have cried in the city (the children are laughing)
I have worn many colors (the children are laughing)
They are older than I am, their death is upon them
I will wear no shoes when the princes are dying.
-Gwendolyn MacEwen
Thesis: MacEwan's use of imagery, first person point of view, and repetition serves as a clear demonstration into the reaction she thinks that children have to life's dire circumstances.
Questions:
1. Who do you think MacEwan is talking about when she says, 'the children'?
2. She says, "They are older than I am, their feet are shoeless. They have lived a thousand years; the children are laughing." Why do you think she still refers to them as children if they have 'lived a thousand years'?
3. Why do you think the poem mentions Monday, but no other day?
4. Do you think that children today act older than they actually are? In what ways?
5. How do you think "The children are laughing and their death is upon them" applies to our lives? Do you think it's an accurate representation of our youth?
6. What do you think she means in the final line when she says, "I will wear no shoes when the princes are dying"?
Sunday, March 28, 2010
ISU Choices
I thought that the best way of "saving" an ISU author would be to make your choice public--here!
You may still wish to run some possibilities by me, which is fine. Once your mind is made up, however, leave your author and book choice in the comment section below.
You may still wish to run some possibilities by me, which is fine. Once your mind is made up, however, leave your author and book choice in the comment section below.
Friday, March 26, 2010
A Dream Within A Dream + Handout
A Dream Within A Dream
by Edgar Allen Poe
Take this kiss upon the brow!
And, in parting from you now,
Thus much let me avow--
You are not wrong, who deem
That my days have been a dream;
Yet if hope has flown away
In a night, or in a day,
In a vision, or in none,
Is it therefore the less gone?
All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream.
I stand amid the roar
Of a surf-tormented shore,
And I hold within my hand
Grains of the golden sand--
Through my fingers too the deep,
While I weep--while I weep!
O God! can I not grasp
Them with a tighter clasp?
O God! can I not save
One from the pitiless wave?
Is all that we see or seem
But a dream within a dream?
Thesis: Poe uses mood shifting, repetition and imagery to reflect on his anguish toward the memory of moments that have slipped away during his life.
1) What do you think Poe means by, "all that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream?"
2) To what could you compare the golden sand? What could this be a metaphor for?
3) Why do you think the speaker considers moments in life to be dreams within a dream?
4) If moments are dreams in a dream, what dreams are they all in?
5) Does Poe take on an optimistic perspective or a pessimistic one?
by Edgar Allen Poe
Take this kiss upon the brow!
And, in parting from you now,
Thus much let me avow--
You are not wrong, who deem
That my days have been a dream;
Yet if hope has flown away
In a night, or in a day,
In a vision, or in none,
Is it therefore the less gone?
All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream.
I stand amid the roar
Of a surf-tormented shore,
And I hold within my hand
Grains of the golden sand--
Through my fingers too the deep,
While I weep--while I weep!
O God! can I not grasp
Them with a tighter clasp?
O God! can I not save
One from the pitiless wave?
Is all that we see or seem
But a dream within a dream?
Thesis: Poe uses mood shifting, repetition and imagery to reflect on his anguish toward the memory of moments that have slipped away during his life.
1) What do you think Poe means by, "all that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream?"
2) To what could you compare the golden sand? What could this be a metaphor for?
3) Why do you think the speaker considers moments in life to be dreams within a dream?
4) If moments are dreams in a dream, what dreams are they all in?
5) Does Poe take on an optimistic perspective or a pessimistic one?
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Tanya's Poem + Handout
“Porphyria’s Lover”
Robert Browning
The rain set early in tonight,
The sullen wind was soon awake,
It tore the elm-tops down for spite,
and did its worst to vex the lake:
I listened with heart fit to break.
When glided in Porphyria; straight
She shut the cold out and the storm,
And kneeled and made the cheerless grate
Blaze up, and all the cottage warm;
Which done, she rose, and from her form
Withdrew the dripping cloak and shawl,
And laid her soiled gloves by, untied
Her hat and let the damp hair fall,
And, last, she sat down by my side
And called me. When no voice replied,
She put my arm about her waist,
And made her smooth white shoulder bare,
And all her yellow hair displaced,
And, stooping, made my cheek lie there,
And spread, o’er all, her yellow hair,
Murmuring how she loved me—she
Too weak, for all her heart’s endeavor,
To set its struggling passion free
From pride, and vainer ties dissever,
And give herself to me forever.
But passion sometimes would prevail,
Nor could tonight’s gay feast restrain
A sudden thought of one so pale
For love of her, and all in vain:
So, she was come through wind and rain.
Be sure I looked up at her eyes
Happy and proud; at last I knew
Porphyria worshiped me: surprise
Made my heart swell, and still it grew
While I debated what to do.
That moment she was mine, mine, fair,
Perfectly pure and good: I found
A thing to do, and all her hair
In one long yellow string I wound
Three times her little throat around,
And strangled her. No pain felt she;
I am quite sure she felt no pain.
As a shut bud that holds a bee,
I warily oped her lids: again
Laughed the blue eyes without a stain.
And I untightened next the tress
About her neck; her cheek once more
Blushed bright beneath my burning kiss:
I propped her head up as before
Only, this time my shoulder bore
Her head, which droops upon it still:
The smiling rosy little head,
So glad it has its utmost will,
That all it scorned at once is fled,
And I, its love, am gained instead!
Porphyria’s love: she guessed not how
Her darling one wish would be heard.
And thus we sit together now,
And all night long we have not stirred,
And yet God has not said a word!
Thesis: Browning’s dramatic monologue uses pathetic fallacy, foreshadowing, imagery and a shifting tone to portray the reasoning of an infatuated madman.
1. By definition, Porphyria is a disorder characterized by mental disturbances, hallucinations and pains. Why do you think Browning named the narrator’s lover after this disorder?
2. At what point in the poem did you begin to distrust the speaker? Were there clues that foreshadowed the speaker’s intentions prior to this point?
3. How does the tone of the poem change from when Porphyria first arrives at the speaker’s house to after her death? Why does this change occur?
4. What is the significance of the last line in respect to the rest of the poem?
5. Do you think the narrator had good intentions in killing Porphyria? Why or why not?
Robert Browning
The rain set early in tonight,
The sullen wind was soon awake,
It tore the elm-tops down for spite,
and did its worst to vex the lake:
I listened with heart fit to break.
When glided in Porphyria; straight
She shut the cold out and the storm,
And kneeled and made the cheerless grate
Blaze up, and all the cottage warm;
Which done, she rose, and from her form
Withdrew the dripping cloak and shawl,
And laid her soiled gloves by, untied
Her hat and let the damp hair fall,
And, last, she sat down by my side
And called me. When no voice replied,
She put my arm about her waist,
And made her smooth white shoulder bare,
And all her yellow hair displaced,
And, stooping, made my cheek lie there,
And spread, o’er all, her yellow hair,
Murmuring how she loved me—she
Too weak, for all her heart’s endeavor,
To set its struggling passion free
From pride, and vainer ties dissever,
And give herself to me forever.
But passion sometimes would prevail,
Nor could tonight’s gay feast restrain
A sudden thought of one so pale
For love of her, and all in vain:
So, she was come through wind and rain.
Be sure I looked up at her eyes
Happy and proud; at last I knew
Porphyria worshiped me: surprise
Made my heart swell, and still it grew
While I debated what to do.
That moment she was mine, mine, fair,
Perfectly pure and good: I found
A thing to do, and all her hair
In one long yellow string I wound
Three times her little throat around,
And strangled her. No pain felt she;
I am quite sure she felt no pain.
As a shut bud that holds a bee,
I warily oped her lids: again
Laughed the blue eyes without a stain.
And I untightened next the tress
About her neck; her cheek once more
Blushed bright beneath my burning kiss:
I propped her head up as before
Only, this time my shoulder bore
Her head, which droops upon it still:
The smiling rosy little head,
So glad it has its utmost will,
That all it scorned at once is fled,
And I, its love, am gained instead!
Porphyria’s love: she guessed not how
Her darling one wish would be heard.
And thus we sit together now,
And all night long we have not stirred,
And yet God has not said a word!
Thesis: Browning’s dramatic monologue uses pathetic fallacy, foreshadowing, imagery and a shifting tone to portray the reasoning of an infatuated madman.
1. By definition, Porphyria is a disorder characterized by mental disturbances, hallucinations and pains. Why do you think Browning named the narrator’s lover after this disorder?
2. At what point in the poem did you begin to distrust the speaker? Were there clues that foreshadowed the speaker’s intentions prior to this point?
3. How does the tone of the poem change from when Porphyria first arrives at the speaker’s house to after her death? Why does this change occur?
4. What is the significance of the last line in respect to the rest of the poem?
5. Do you think the narrator had good intentions in killing Porphyria? Why or why not?
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Trella's Handout
The Lady's Yes
by: Elizabeth Barrett Browning
"Yes," I answered you last night;
"No," this morning, Sir, I say.
Colours seen by candlelight,
Will not look the same by day.
When the viols played their best,
Lamps above, and laughs below--
Love me sounded like a jest,
Fit for Yes or fit for No.
Call me false, or call me free--
Vow, whatever light may shine,
No man on your face shall see
Any grief for change on mine.
Yet the sin is on us both--
Time to dance is not to woo--
Wooer light makes fickle troth--
Scorn of me recoils on you.
Learn to win a lady's faith
Nobly, as the thing is high;
Bravely, as for life and death--
With a loyal gravity.
Lead her from the festive boards,
Point her to the starry skies,
Guard her, by your truthful words,
Pure from courtship's flatteries.
By your truth she shall be true--
Ever true, as wives of yore--
And her Yes, once said to you,
SHALL be Yes for evermore
Browning uses didactic elements, structured stanzas, and a variable tone as a way to show how a woman should act within society during the late 1800's.
1. How did Browning continually use “Yes”, and “No” to show the speaker's intentions?
2. The tone changes between the third and fourth stanzas, how does this show the speakers feelings?
3. What kind of relationship is going on between the speaker and the person being spoken to? What point of view might each person take on the situation?
4. How does Browning use structured stanzas to enhance the poem?
5. Do you feel as if you can relate to this poem, even though it refers to courting in the 1800's?
*didactic elements (meant to teach)
by: Elizabeth Barrett Browning
"Yes," I answered you last night;
"No," this morning, Sir, I say.
Colours seen by candlelight,
Will not look the same by day.
When the viols played their best,
Lamps above, and laughs below--
Love me sounded like a jest,
Fit for Yes or fit for No.
Call me false, or call me free--
Vow, whatever light may shine,
No man on your face shall see
Any grief for change on mine.
Yet the sin is on us both--
Time to dance is not to woo--
Wooer light makes fickle troth--
Scorn of me recoils on you.
Learn to win a lady's faith
Nobly, as the thing is high;
Bravely, as for life and death--
With a loyal gravity.
Lead her from the festive boards,
Point her to the starry skies,
Guard her, by your truthful words,
Pure from courtship's flatteries.
By your truth she shall be true--
Ever true, as wives of yore--
And her Yes, once said to you,
SHALL be Yes for evermore
Browning uses didactic elements, structured stanzas, and a variable tone as a way to show how a woman should act within society during the late 1800's.
1. How did Browning continually use “Yes”, and “No” to show the speaker's intentions?
2. The tone changes between the third and fourth stanzas, how does this show the speakers feelings?
3. What kind of relationship is going on between the speaker and the person being spoken to? What point of view might each person take on the situation?
4. How does Browning use structured stanzas to enhance the poem?
5. Do you feel as if you can relate to this poem, even though it refers to courting in the 1800's?
*didactic elements (meant to teach)
Friday, March 5, 2010
Omer's Poem and Handout
The Summer Day
By: Mary Oliver
Who made the world?
Who made the swan, and the black bear?
Who made the grasshopper?
This grasshopper, I mean--
the one who has flung herself out of the grass,
the one who is eating sugar out of my hand,
who is moving her jaws back and forth instead of up and down--
who is gazing around with her enormous and complicated eyes.
Now she lifts her pale forearms and thoroughly washes her face.
Now she snaps her wings open, and floats away.
I don't know exactly what a prayer is.
I do know how to pay attention, how to fall down
into the grass, how to kneel in the grass,
how to be idle and blessed, how to stroll through the fields,
which is what I have been doing all day.
Tell me, what else should I have done?
Doesn't everything die at last, and too soon?
Tell me, what is it you plan to do
With your one wild and precious life?
Thesis: Oliver’s use of imagery, description, and questions to demonstrate how even the most insignificant things can be full of detail and should not be overlooked.
1. Do you think the poem has a religious tone to it? Why or why not?
2. Why do you think Oliver uses so much description on the grasshopper?
3. What words in the poem make it easy to visualize what is being said?
4. What do you think the speaker means when he or she says “I don’t know exactly what a prayer is?” Do you think this contradicts when he or she states that they know “how to be idle and blessed?”
5. Comment on the final two lines in regards to the rest of the poem.
By: Mary Oliver
Who made the world?
Who made the swan, and the black bear?
Who made the grasshopper?
This grasshopper, I mean--
the one who has flung herself out of the grass,
the one who is eating sugar out of my hand,
who is moving her jaws back and forth instead of up and down--
who is gazing around with her enormous and complicated eyes.
Now she lifts her pale forearms and thoroughly washes her face.
Now she snaps her wings open, and floats away.
I don't know exactly what a prayer is.
I do know how to pay attention, how to fall down
into the grass, how to kneel in the grass,
how to be idle and blessed, how to stroll through the fields,
which is what I have been doing all day.
Tell me, what else should I have done?
Doesn't everything die at last, and too soon?
Tell me, what is it you plan to do
With your one wild and precious life?
Thesis: Oliver’s use of imagery, description, and questions to demonstrate how even the most insignificant things can be full of detail and should not be overlooked.
1. Do you think the poem has a religious tone to it? Why or why not?
2. Why do you think Oliver uses so much description on the grasshopper?
3. What words in the poem make it easy to visualize what is being said?
4. What do you think the speaker means when he or she says “I don’t know exactly what a prayer is?” Do you think this contradicts when he or she states that they know “how to be idle and blessed?”
5. Comment on the final two lines in regards to the rest of the poem.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
by Emily Dickinson
My Life had stood - a Loaded Gun -
In Corners - till a Day
The Owner passed - identified -
And carried Me away –
And now We roam in Sovreign Woods -
And now We hunt the Doe -
And every time I speak for Him
The Mountains straight reply –
And do I smile, such cordial light
Opon the Valley glow -
It is as a Vesuvian face
Had let it’s pleasure through –
And when at Night - Our good Day done -
I guard My Master’s Head -
’Tis better than the Eider Duck’s
Deep Pillow - to have shared –
To foe of His - I’m deadly foe -
None stir the second time -
On whom I lay a Yellow Eye -
Or an emphatic Thumb –
Though I than He - may longer live
He longer must - than I -
For I have but the power to kill,
Without - the power to die –
Thesis: Dickenson uses personification, metaphors, and imagery to portray the intricacy of life and death.
After first reading/hearing this poem what do you think the narrator is trying to portray?
Does the mood or tone of the poem change throughout the stanzas?
How can separate lines as well as the whole poem be considered a metaphor?
Are there any other ways to perceive this poem other than the literal way?
What do you think Dickenson is trying to make the reader think about life and death?
Is there any stanza that you feel has the most emotion or meaning behind it? Why?
My Life had stood - a Loaded Gun -
In Corners - till a Day
The Owner passed - identified -
And carried Me away –
And now We roam in Sovreign Woods -
And now We hunt the Doe -
And every time I speak for Him
The Mountains straight reply –
And do I smile, such cordial light
Opon the Valley glow -
It is as a Vesuvian face
Had let it’s pleasure through –
And when at Night - Our good Day done -
I guard My Master’s Head -
’Tis better than the Eider Duck’s
Deep Pillow - to have shared –
To foe of His - I’m deadly foe -
None stir the second time -
On whom I lay a Yellow Eye -
Or an emphatic Thumb –
Though I than He - may longer live
He longer must - than I -
For I have but the power to kill,
Without - the power to die –
Thesis: Dickenson uses personification, metaphors, and imagery to portray the intricacy of life and death.
After first reading/hearing this poem what do you think the narrator is trying to portray?
Does the mood or tone of the poem change throughout the stanzas?
How can separate lines as well as the whole poem be considered a metaphor?
Are there any other ways to perceive this poem other than the literal way?
What do you think Dickenson is trying to make the reader think about life and death?
Is there any stanza that you feel has the most emotion or meaning behind it? Why?
Online Poetry Discussion
Thanks, Amy, for starting us off.
Here are Amy's thoughts on Rhonda's presentation. Please, please add comments. I'll post Jacquelyn's poem in a separate presentation.
Amy said: Here are my thoughts on the questions Rhonda presented:
1. I think that the poet may have compared the ending of a sidewalk to the beginning of a street, because when you're younger and walking on the sidewalk, it's safe. You're protected and are walking a direction that's set out for you. When you grow older, and into adolescence, you walk on the road, or drive on the road, whatever. This is more dangerous, and there's more possibilities for what could come towards you. It's bigger and scarier, and you're no longer under the protection of the 'sidewalk'.
2. Like everyone else suggested, I think that he repeated himself to get the point across.
3. I believe that you can always be a 'kid', but you reach a point (usually around the beginning of adolescence) where it is something that is no longer accepted and respected. It's difficult when you're a teenager, because you're too young to be a real adult, but too old to be able to do nothing and make a fuss about situations and still be respected. However, I think that a good dose of being a 'kid' every once in a while is healthy. Like, say, jumping on the bed occasionally. (:
4. I think that whereas the beginning of the poem is talking about the sidewalk ending as adulthood starts, I think that in this stanza, it's talking more about the sidewalk of life ending. It's foreshadowing the remainder of our lives, which are for the most part dark and smokey and cement-like (because being an adult isn't easy), but there's little bursts of childhood here and there (like the flower he mentions).
5. This poem kind of leaves me with a negative feeling about growing up, and leaving the safety behind. However, the fact that it talks about how we just keep walking, and walking together, makes me feel a little hopeful.
Here are Amy's thoughts on Rhonda's presentation. Please, please add comments. I'll post Jacquelyn's poem in a separate presentation.
Amy said: Here are my thoughts on the questions Rhonda presented:
1. I think that the poet may have compared the ending of a sidewalk to the beginning of a street, because when you're younger and walking on the sidewalk, it's safe. You're protected and are walking a direction that's set out for you. When you grow older, and into adolescence, you walk on the road, or drive on the road, whatever. This is more dangerous, and there's more possibilities for what could come towards you. It's bigger and scarier, and you're no longer under the protection of the 'sidewalk'.
2. Like everyone else suggested, I think that he repeated himself to get the point across.
3. I believe that you can always be a 'kid', but you reach a point (usually around the beginning of adolescence) where it is something that is no longer accepted and respected. It's difficult when you're a teenager, because you're too young to be a real adult, but too old to be able to do nothing and make a fuss about situations and still be respected. However, I think that a good dose of being a 'kid' every once in a while is healthy. Like, say, jumping on the bed occasionally. (:
4. I think that whereas the beginning of the poem is talking about the sidewalk ending as adulthood starts, I think that in this stanza, it's talking more about the sidewalk of life ending. It's foreshadowing the remainder of our lives, which are for the most part dark and smokey and cement-like (because being an adult isn't easy), but there's little bursts of childhood here and there (like the flower he mentions).
5. This poem kind of leaves me with a negative feeling about growing up, and leaving the safety behind. However, the fact that it talks about how we just keep walking, and walking together, makes me feel a little hopeful.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Dustin's Poem and Comments
Sonnet: Silence (1840)
by Edgar Allan Poe(1809-1849)
There are some qualities–some incorporate things,
That have a double life, which thus is made
A type of that twin entity which springs
From matter and light, evinced in solid and shade.
There is a two-fold Silence–sea and shore-
Body and soul. One dwells in lonely places,
Newly with grass o'ergrown; some solemn graces,
Some human memories and tearful lore,
Render him terrorless: his name's "No More."
He is the corporate Silence: dread him not!
No power hath he of evil in himself;
But should some urgent fate (untimely lot!)
Bring thee to meet his shadow (nameless elf,
That haunteth the lone regions where hath trod
No foot of man,) commend thyself to God!
THE END
by Edgar Allan Poe(1809-1849)
There are some qualities–some incorporate things,
That have a double life, which thus is made
A type of that twin entity which springs
From matter and light, evinced in solid and shade.
There is a two-fold Silence–sea and shore-
Body and soul. One dwells in lonely places,
Newly with grass o'ergrown; some solemn graces,
Some human memories and tearful lore,
Render him terrorless: his name's "No More."
He is the corporate Silence: dread him not!
No power hath he of evil in himself;
But should some urgent fate (untimely lot!)
Bring thee to meet his shadow (nameless elf,
That haunteth the lone regions where hath trod
No foot of man,) commend thyself to God!
THE END
Rhonda's Poem and Comments
There is a place where the sidewalk ends
And before the street begins,
And there the grass grows soft and white,
And there the sun burns crimson bright,
And there the moon-bird rests from his flight
To cool in the peppermint wind.
Let us leave this place where the smoke blows black
And the dark street winds and bends.
Past the pits where the asphalt flowers grow
We shall walk with a walk that is measured and slow,
And watch where the chalk-white arrows go
To the place where the sidewalk ends.
Yes we'll walk with a walk that is measured and slow,
And we'll go where the chalk-white arrows go,
For the children, they mark, and the children, they know
The place where the sidewalk ends.
Shel Silverstein
And before the street begins,
And there the grass grows soft and white,
And there the sun burns crimson bright,
And there the moon-bird rests from his flight
To cool in the peppermint wind.
Let us leave this place where the smoke blows black
And the dark street winds and bends.
Past the pits where the asphalt flowers grow
We shall walk with a walk that is measured and slow,
And watch where the chalk-white arrows go
To the place where the sidewalk ends.
Yes we'll walk with a walk that is measured and slow,
And we'll go where the chalk-white arrows go,
For the children, they mark, and the children, they know
The place where the sidewalk ends.
Shel Silverstein
Monday, February 22, 2010
The Stone Angel as a Canadian Novel
I think it is worth considering what exactly makes a given novel Canadian (or American, or British for that matter).
The poorest grounds to establish The Stone Angel`s Canadian-ness upon are that it was written by a Canadian or that it is set in Canada.
Many writers , including Laurence, write novels set in other parts of the world and it would be tough to argue that most of them are strong examples of Canadian novels.
On the other hand, Susanna Moodie wrote a novel called Roughing it in the Bush describing her travels in what used to be known as Upper and Lower Canada, but it is set before Canada was even confederated. There are many novels that would be more deserving of status as a Canadian novel.
So a Canadian novel has to be in some way tied in to the idea of Canada. This is a problem in a country that is so diverse in its people and regions. A Canadian novel would somehow have to tie into some themes and aspects of Canada that are widely applicable.
Themes:
Acknowledged racist treatment of Metis and First Nations people.
Classicism that exists in Canada, contrary to the popular myth.
The fortitude of the pioneer generation.
Buying and selling of Chineese immigrants (Mr. Oatley)
Ontario and Cities as places of economic opportunity and culture
Historical Aspects of the Novel:
The dirty thirties, economic depression and Bennet buggies
Vimy Ridge
Idiom of different generations
The poorest grounds to establish The Stone Angel`s Canadian-ness upon are that it was written by a Canadian or that it is set in Canada.
Many writers , including Laurence, write novels set in other parts of the world and it would be tough to argue that most of them are strong examples of Canadian novels.
On the other hand, Susanna Moodie wrote a novel called Roughing it in the Bush describing her travels in what used to be known as Upper and Lower Canada, but it is set before Canada was even confederated. There are many novels that would be more deserving of status as a Canadian novel.
So a Canadian novel has to be in some way tied in to the idea of Canada. This is a problem in a country that is so diverse in its people and regions. A Canadian novel would somehow have to tie into some themes and aspects of Canada that are widely applicable.
Themes:
Acknowledged racist treatment of Metis and First Nations people.
Classicism that exists in Canada, contrary to the popular myth.
The fortitude of the pioneer generation.
Buying and selling of Chineese immigrants (Mr. Oatley)
Ontario and Cities as places of economic opportunity and culture
Historical Aspects of the Novel:
The dirty thirties, economic depression and Bennet buggies
Vimy Ridge
Idiom of different generations
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Welcome
This space will be primarily devoted to supporting some of the ongoing discussions we will be having about the course literature, themes, assignments and anything else. By all means, ask questions and score oral particpation marks by exercising your voice here.
In order to be able to post comments, simply email ewcwriter@live.ca and ask to be added to the English 4U blog. Be sure to include your full name in the email if it's not apparent in your email address.
I look forward to working with you all.
CP
In order to be able to post comments, simply email ewcwriter@live.ca and ask to be added to the English 4U blog. Be sure to include your full name in the email if it's not apparent in your email address.
I look forward to working with you all.
CP
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)